Political Opinion and Commentary for the Progressive Internet


HOME PAGE                                                         Essays by Ernest Partridge

Editor's Choice
The Crisis
Imperialism, Foreign Relations
The Media
The Elections
The Obama Administration
The G. W. Bush Administration
Progressivism / Democrats
Republicans -- Right Wing
Civil Liberties -- Dissent
Moral Issues -- The Law
Science, Philosophy, Education
The Environment
Lies -- Propaganda -- Corruption
Culture War -- Religious Right
Chronological list of Essays

Ernest Partridge's Blog

The Online Gadfly
(EP's Professional Website

Conscience of a Progressive
(A Book in Progress)


Essays by Bernard Weiner

Favorite Articles
Essays and Analyses
Book/Film Reviews
Celebrity "Diaries" & "Memos"
"Shallow Throat" Conversations
The "Dummies" Primers
Satires, Fantasies and Parables

Bernard Weiner's Blog


Guest Essays

Letters to The Crisis Papers
The Dissenting Internet
The Activists' Page
The Liberty Library

The Editors' Page

Contact Us:
    Ernest Partridge
    Bernard Weiner


James Comey Visits His Shrink

By Bernard Weiner 
Co-Editor, The Crisis Papers

November 3, 2016

PSYCHIATRIST: So, Mr. Comey, tell me why youíre here today.

COMEY: Iím way wired, I can hardly sleep, when I do manage to fall asleep my dreams are intense and scary. Iím getting by on coffee and junk food. My wife is worried for me and demanded that I seek immediate help.

PSY:   It seems like a good place to start might be the stressful situation you now find yourself in. Would you agree?

COM: You bet. It all started last summer when I decided ó in what I now recognize was a bad mistake in judgement ó to publicly talk about Hillary Clintonís emails investigation. I need to stop here to clarify something: I feel I can talk about this with you only under the strictest rules of confidentiality.

PSY:   Please know that I am prohibited by the law and by custom and by the ethics of the psychiatric profession from divulging anything you relate to me. Nothing you say leaves this room. In fact, I will put down my notepad and pen, so that no record will exist of our conversation. Will this suffice in alleviating your concerns? 

COM: Yes, thank you. Iím placing this sound disrupter on the table ó just in case anybody is sweeping for conversation. It breaks up words into shredder-like noise-chaff.

PSY:   I hope you will talk more about who might want to listen in on this session. But, regardless, If this makes you feel more secure, itís fine with me. Please proceed. 

COM: So what I was about to say has to do with the political snake pit that is the FBI. There are partisan and ideological factions so entrenched in the Bureau that it makes the Justice Department ís political culture seem like a Sunday School picnic.

PSY:   Are you suggesting that these factions are actually warring with each other?

COM: Exactly. And because these tribes at the Bureau leak like a sieve to the media ó it seems that every senior agent has direct access to favorite journalists at the Times, Post, Fox News, BuzzFeed, Wall Street Journal, all of them ó and, since my staff memos on this subject had little to no effect, I had to quickly learn how to keep everybody happy.

PSY:   What does that mean, ďto keep everybody happyĒ?

COM: On hyper-controversial matters, Iíd have to throw red meat to one faction ó say the more rightwing extremists ó and placate with a similar gesture to, say, the more moderate faction.

PSY:   Iím guessing that you felt put upon by this situation ó under constant tension.

COM: You got it. For example, last July, when I summed up our non-case with regard to Hillary Clintonís email investigation, I felt that I had to include some harsh quotes about her sloppy security procedures ó which would provide ammunition to Trump ó as a balancer for not recommending a criminal indictment. 

PSY:   I have to ask a simple question here, one voiced by many in the days after: Why did you feel you had to say anything? Itís my understanding that the FBI does not issue public statements about ongoing cases that do not result in charges being filed.

COM: On that July matter, and the more recent statement with regard to the emails found on Anthony Weinerís computer, I knew for a certainty that the Trump-supporting faction would leak to the press. I decided to try to dilute the impact of those leaks by issuing my own release. It was a risky strategy, I grant you, one that blew up in my face. 

PSY:   Why do you think it exploded that way?

COM: This is going to sound a bit strange, but I thought my reputation as a honest broker, a straight-shooter, a lawman of integrity would work its magic andó

PSY:   But you issued your most recent statement with only 11 days to go before the election, something, as I understand it, that is against the FBIís own protocols. You injected yourself into a partisan fight. Your DOJ superiors advised against your plan, but you went ahead anyway. Why?

COM: Because I was stupid, because I was exhausted, because I wanted to head off the extremistsí language, because I wanted the limelight, because in this instance, I elevated my competence-factor way beyond reality. The result is that I appeared incompetent, way too hasty and ambitious, out of my depth. And, worst of all, that I was a partisan for Trump, whereas the truth is I have few positive feelings for either of them. Both are morally suspect, both politicians carrying a lot of legal baggage. I despise her and heís a lying demagogue who scares the piss out of me. 


PSY:   Given all thatís gone down, can you imagine any steps you can take to resurrect your estimable reputation?

COM: Maybe, if the facts warrant it, announce ASAP that the Clinton emails situation hasnít changed since July and thatís the end of the matter. But there will be push-back or leak-back from rightist agents. And there may not be enough time to make it right in the first place. And/or move the Trump-and-Russia investigation front-and-center, to balance out the Clinton damage somewhat. Or maybe just resign, with a mea culpa and let time do its thing and try for a political comeback in a year or two after the dust has settled.

PSY:   We have just a bit of time left. Do you want to take a look at one of the troublesome dreams you mentioned?

COM: Sure. In this one, Iím at the FBI gun range, taking target practice. Iím aiming at the red-and-black bullseye, which suddenly turns orange. Then I aim at a white suit; my gun turns into an arced bow and the arrow is now coming straight at me. I wake up in fright. You know what, doc? I get whatís being alluded to here. I think I do need another line of work.


Bernard Weiner, a playwright and poet, has authored numerous fantasias, parodies and satires. (www.crisispapers.org/weinerpubs.htm). A Ph.D. in government & international relations, he has taught at various universities, worked as a writer-editor with the San Francisco Chronicle, and currently co-edits The Crisis Papers (www.crisispapers.org). 





Crisis Papers editors, Partridge & Weiner, are available for public speaking appearances